For the Yanomamo culture, when
one wishes to break the rules they will do so if it interest them. Some consequences are shouting matches, chest pounding duels, side slapping duels, club fights,
fights with axes and machetes,
and shooting with bows and arrows with the intent to kill with other men. The Yanomamo depend
on themselves and their closes kin to help them out when dealing with these
consequences. The Yanomamo also have no written
language, precise number system, formal laws, or institutionalized adjudicators
such as chiefs or judges which explains why their culture is the way it is.
Western cultures differ from the Yanomamo culture because we are the
exact opposite for the most part. In Western cultures we do have people that
rebel and don’t care about any sort of consequences but for the most part, society abides by the rules and followes them. Written language, laws,
judges, jails, etc; are all examples of systems the western culture has
instilled into our society to prevent the lifestyle the Yanomamo live.
We need laws against killings because even though it is universally
seen to be a bad thing that no one wants to do, there are people out in the
world that do have psychological problems and will kill even though it is not
an act out of defense. The article states that one must understand the complexity
of kinship relationship and the role they play in their culture. I believe that
statement was saying, you don’t know how you will act out because you are not
in the Yanomamo shoes.A person not living in the Yanomamo culture cannot say "i would never act like that, i would never kill someone" because what you say and what you do is completly different when actually being in the situation. Laws
provide protection that basically makes someone think twice before they act out
in violence and kill.
You made very good points about why there should be laws against killing another human. Great post!
ReplyDeleteYou say: "The Yanomamo also have no written language, precise number system, formal laws, or institutionalized adjudicators such as chiefs or judges which explains why their culture is the way it is."
ReplyDeleteI don't think I agree with this statement. There are other cultures that can be described this way that doesn't practice similar systems of revenge killings. Easy on the grand judgements!
Good discussion through the body of the post.
Your analysis takes a kind of biased route in the last paragraph. So killing only occurs for pathological reasons? In the article on the Yanomamo, we see that killing occur for revenge, for reproduction, for resources, for status, and for protection. How is that any different from killings that occur in our culture? Would you consider the Yanomamo to be pathological? Or perhaps are our cultures not that different in terms of the causes of violence, even if our systems of justice differ in how killing is viewed and punished?